Janice Tjen v Joanna Garland
The market
Percentages are the implied chance of winning with the bookmaker's margin removed.
Head to head
This season & this event
Ranking points fall off a year after they are earned, so a player who went deep here last year must match it or drop in the rankings. That shapes effort in a way the price does not always show.
The players


Ranking, record and surface splits are for the most recent season on file. Height, weight and handedness are not published by our data provider.
J. Tjen — last 10
With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.
| Date | Event | Surface | Opponent | Score | Their price | Market | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-02 | Chennai | Hard | K. Hui | — | — | WON | |
Games in each set6-1 6-2 TjenHuiPoints won68%32%Serve points won78%39%Return points won61%22%Games held6 of 72 of 8Break points saved0 of 13 of 9Aces20Double faults01 | |||||||
| 2026-10-28 | Guangzhou | Hard | H. Dart | 1.47 | 66% | LOST | |
Games in each set4-6 6-3 3-6 TjenDartPoints won49%51%Serve points won58%60%Return points won40%42%Games held10 of 1411 of 14Break points saved6 of 106 of 9Aces67Double faults14 | |||||||
| 2026-10-27 | Guangzhou | Hard | P. Kudermetova | 1.62 | 60% | WON | |
Games in each set6-2 6-2 TjenKudermetovaPoints won61%39%Serve points won79%53%Return points won47%21%Games held8 of 84 of 8Break points saved0 of 02 of 6Aces43Double faults05 | |||||||
| 2026-10-19 | Osaka | Hard | A. Krueger | 2.16 | 55% | LOST | |
Games in each set4-6 4-6 TjenKruegerPoints won44%56%Serve points won64%80%Return points won20%36%Games held8 of 1010 of 10Break points saved4 of 61 of 1Aces84Double faults41 | |||||||
| 2026-10-15 | Wuhan | Hard | A. Li | 2.83 | 66% | LOST | |
Games in each set1-6 6-7 TjenLiPoints won42%58%Serve points won57%69%Return points won31%43%Games held7 of 910 of 10Break points saved4 of 66 of 6Aces211Double faults13 | |||||||
| 2026-10-14 | Wuhan | Hard | D. Snigur | 2.52 | 61% | WON | |
Games in each set7-5 6-3 TjenSnigurPoints won55%45%Serve points won56%46%Return points won54%44%Games held7 of 114 of 10Break points saved2 of 63 of 9Aces41Double faults33 | |||||||
| 2026-10-12 | Wuhan | Hard | A. Ito | 1.34 | 72% | WON | |
Games in each set6-3 6-1 TjenItoPoints won60%40%Serve points won59%40%Return points won60%41%Games held6 of 82 of 8Break points saved3 of 52 of 8Aces00Double faults73 | |||||||
| 2026-10-02 | Beijing | Hard | D. Shnaider | 3.20 | 70% | LOST | |
Games in each set0-6 4-6 TjenShnaiderPoints won39%61%Serve points won48%70%Return points won30%52%Games held4 of 88 of 8Break points saved3 of 73 of 3Aces62Double faults30 | |||||||
| 2026-09-30 | Beijing | Hard | A. Kalinina | 1.85 | 52% | WON | |
Games in each set2-6 7-5 6-4 TjenKalininaPoints won52%48%Serve points won62%59%Return points won41%38%Games held11 of 1511 of 15Break points saved12 of 169 of 13Aces132Double faults49 | |||||||
| 2026-09-15 | Guadalajara | Clay | S. Stephens | 1.72 | 55% | LOST | |
Games in each set6-7 6-7 TjenStephensPoints won47%53%Serve points won63%71%Return points won29%37%Games held10 of 1210 of 12Break points saved2 of 40 of 2Aces112Double faults51 | |||||||
J. Garland — last 10
With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.
| Date | Event | Surface | Opponent | Score | Their price | Market | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-02 | Chennai | Hard | J. Teichmann | 2.06 | 53% | WON | |
Games in each set6-3 6-4 GarlandTeichmannPoints won56%44%Serve points won63%52%Return points won48%37%Games held8 of 105 of 9Break points saved3 of 55 of 9Aces42Double faults14 | |||||||
| 2026-10-25 | Guangzhou | Hard | T. Prozorova | 2.27 | 58% | LOST | |
Games in each set4-6 6-3 3-6 GarlandProzorovaPoints won46%54%Serve points won60%68%Return points won32%40%Games held11 of 1412 of 14Break points saved5 of 86 of 8Aces15Double faults02 | |||||||
| 2026-10-24 | Guangzhou | Hard | M. Inglis | 2.17 | 55% | WON | |
Games in each set6-1 6-3 GarlandInglisPoints won60%40%Serve points won65%44%Return points won56%35%Games held7 of 83 of 8Break points saved3 of 48 of 13Aces63Double faults42 | |||||||
| 2026-09-23 | Singapore | Hard (Indoor) | Xin. Wang | 4.13 | 76% | LOST | |
Games in each set5-7 4-6 GarlandWangPoints won47%53%Serve points won62%68%Return points won32%38%Games held8 of 1110 of 11Break points saved2 of 53 of 4Aces13Double faults23 | |||||||
| 2026-09-21 | Singapore | Hard (Indoor) | S. Hunter | 1.79 | 54% | WON | |
Games in each set6-3 5-7 6-1 GarlandHunterPoints won51%49%Serve points won57%54%Return points won46%43%Games held10 of 147 of 14Break points saved5 of 95 of 12Aces64Double faults53 | |||||||
| 2026-09-20 | Singapore | Hard (Indoor) | V. Morvayova | 1.24 | 78% | WON | |
Games in each set6-4 6-3 GarlandMorvayovaPoints won55%45%Serve points won64%52%Return points won48%36%Games held8 of 105 of 9Break points saved5 of 74 of 8Aces32Double faults25 | |||||||
| 2026-09-19 | Singapore | Hard (Indoor) | E. Perez | 1.05 | 86% | WON | |
Games in each set6-1 6-2 GarlandPerezPoints won65%35%Serve points won68%38%Return points won62%32%Games held6 of 72 of 7Break points saved1 of 25 of 10Aces31Double faults12 | |||||||
| 2026-09-09 | W50 Guiyang | Hard | S. Wei | 1.32 | 72% | LOST | |
Games in each set2-6 2-6 GarlandWeiPoints won43%57%Serve points won50%64%Return points won36%50%Games held3 of 97 of 8Break points saved5 of 103 of 4 | |||||||
| 2026-09-06 | W75 Tianjin (China) | Hard | D. Astakhova | 1.52 | 63% | WON | |
Games in each set6-3 6-2 GarlandAstakhovaPoints won57%43%Serve points won57%43%Return points won57%43%Games held6 of 92 of 8Break points saved1 of 45 of 11 | |||||||
| 2026-09-05 | W75 Tianjin (China) | Hard | Z. Bai | — | — | WON | |
Games in each set6-0 6-4 GarlandBaiPoints won61%39%Serve points won60%38%Return points won62%40%Games held6 of 82 of 8Break points saved3 of 52 of 8 | |||||||
Common questions
Who is favourite, Janice Tjen or Joanna Garland?
Janice Tjen is favourite at 1.44, which is a 66% chance once the bookmaker's margin is removed.
What are the odds for Janice Tjen vs Joanna Garland?
Janice Tjen is 1.44 and Joanna Garland is 2.75, the prices we recorded for the Chennai match.